Walter Scott’s passenger in traffic stop: ‘He was murdered’

“The next thing you know, he was out the door,” Fulton said.

The gunshots rang out a short time later, he said.

While sitting in the car, Scott called his mother on his cellphone.

“He didn’t sound very good. He sounded in distress,” Jury Scott, 73, told the jury as she fought back tears.

“He said, ‘They were tasing me.’ I heard him groaning like he was in excruciating pain several times,” she said. “I told him, ‘You know North Charleston policemen, so just do whatever they say.’”

Solicitor Scarlett Wilson said Slager fired eight times after failing to subdue Scott with a stun gun; five of the shots hit Scott in the back and buttocks.

The bystander’s video showed Scott, 50, being felled from a distance. It did not capture the entirety of the encounter; nor did the dash cam video from Slager’s cruiser, which recorded only the traffic stop itself.

Jurors watched that dash cam video in court Thursday. It shows Scott suddenly running from his car and out of view after Slager goes to his cruiser to check the license.

North Charleston Police Sgt. Scott Hille, called by the prosecution to introduce the police video, was asked by the defence if it showed anything unprofessional in Slager’s behaviour in handling the stop.

Hille replied: “Not that I can think of, sir.”

Scott’s family members and friends were the first to take the stand. His fiancee, Charlotte Jones, called him a “loving and kind person.” Neighbor Arthur Heyward, who had just sold Scott the car, called him “a good friend and neighbour. We looked out for each other.”

Wilson told the jury of 11 whites and one black in her opening statement that even if Scott wrestled with Slager over the stun gun, that provocation did not justify being shot to death.

“If Walter Scott had not resisted arrest, he wouldn’t have been shot. He paid the extreme consequence for his conduct. He lost his life for his foolishness,” she acknowledged.

But she said Slager must be held accountable for “his decision to go too far — his decision to let his sense of authority get the better of him.”

Defence attorney Andy Savage countered that Slager “earned a reputation of excellence” in his five years with the North Charleston police, and he sought to pin responsibility on Scott.

“Why did he choose not to respect the request to stay where he was? That’s something that I hope you consider,” Savage told the jurors. “It wasn’t Mr. Slager who was angry and full of animosity.”

The family has said Scott may have tried to flee because he was worried about having to go back to jail for missing child support payments. Savage called that “pure speculation,” and said there was no way Slager could have known Scott was unarmed.

“He never had a chance to pat him down. He never had a chance to frisk him,” he said.

An attorney for the Scott family, Chris Stewart, told reporters after the court adjourned following a full day of statements and testimony that the family is not concerned a nearly all-white jury is hearing the case.

“All you need in this case is everything all juries have: two eyes and a brain. It doesn’t matter what colour they are, because they have eyes that can see that videotape,” he said.

___

Kinnard reported from Columbia and can be reached at http://twitter.com/MegKinnardAP . Read more of her work at http://bigstory.ap.org/content/meg-kinnard/ .

Bruce Smith And Meg Kinnard, The Associated Press

by Canadian Press

Walter Scott’s passenger in traffic stop: ‘He was murdered’

What's Trending