Carney warns constitutional reforms ‘difficult,’ says he’s after ‘common solutions’

Nine other referendum questions asked voters whether they want the province to wield new powers in federal areas such as immigration, and if they approve of a series of proposed constitutional changes, such as abolishing the Senate and giving provinces the authority to appoint Superior Court judges.

As of Tuesday afternoon, the ‘yes’ vote was leading on all but one of the nine questions, with very tight margins.

Carney said the federal government will “take into account” those votes.

While Carney said before the referendum that Albertans should vote “no to the nine,” he also told Alberta broadcaster Ryan Jespersen ahead of the referendum vote that he is “open” to constitutional reforms where there is “consensus.”

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Tuesday the federal Liberals have allowed immigration to run “totally out of control” and he supports provinces being able to set their own immigration levels.

“The provinces should have control in selection and numbers because they have to provide the services, regulate the job market and the housing for people who come in,” Poilievre said, noting Carney recently told the New York Times he’s looking at hiking immigration levels again.

“It shows he is totally out of touch.”

Carney said his government has moved to bring immigration back under control.

“Where we go from here — and I’m not saying that that stabilization is complete — but where we go from here needs to be established in co-operation with the provinces,” he said.

When Poilievre was asked by a reporter if he would reopen the Constitution if he were prime minister, he said he’s going to “wait and see” the official final results on all of the referendum questions before commenting. Those figures are expected late next week.

“We respect the frustration of Albertans on some of these questions,” Poilievre said. “We’ll look carefully at the results when they’re certified on those other questions.”

Alberta NDP MP Heather McPherson said the other nine questions posed to Albertans were “really problematic.”

“The idea that (Premier) Danielle Smith will continue to use these as a divisive tactic, a slow-walk towards a separatist agenda, I think, is a problem,” she told reporters on Tuesday.

“The federal government needs to be quite strong in protecting those things that are part of our heritage, part of our culture, in terms of immigration, in terms of our constitutional jurisdictions. I think those are really important things we stand up for.”

Ontario Liberal MP Marcus Powlowski said the provinces don’t have control over immigration and if they want to change the Constitution, “good luck to them.”

“The courts are still there, despite what some Albertans may want,” he said. “As much as they may wish some of these things, it’s not going to happen because it’s unconstitutional.”

Powlowski also said Ottawa could open up constitutional talks to address some of these concerns.

“We should talk to everybody about everything,” he said. “There should be no sacred cows on any political issue. And perhaps we can find common ground, and if that’s the case, then great.”

Alberta Liberal MP Matt Jeneroux said provinces don’t need to hold a referendum to have conversations on these issues.

“These are conversations the prime minister has committed to in the past, in terms of, let’s look at Alberta in a different way and I’m certainly happy to see him doing it.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 20, 2026.

Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press

by The Canadian Press

Carney warns constitutional reforms ‘difficult,’ says he’s after ‘common solutions’

What's Trending