Farrow says NBC misleading in explanation of story

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Bluesky
• Share on X
• Copy Link

Farrow had tweeted overnight that Lack’s statement contained several false and misleading statements — in particular Lack’s claim that Farrow had no women ready to publicly identify themselves with their accusations.

DOOR OF HOPE

Meadow Lake's only food bank floods again, intensifying push for new building

1h ago

bonds amid turmoil

King Charles highlights US-UK bond in speech to Congress noting 'times of great uncertainty'

2h ago

2026 SPRING

Meadow Lake region faces renewed flood risk as temperatures rise

3h ago

“The suggestion to take the story to another outlet was first raised by NBC, not me, and I took them up on it only after it became clear that I was being blocked from further reporting,” Farrow said. “The story was twice cleared and deemed ‘reportable’ by legal and standards only to be blocked by executives who refused to allow us to seek comment from Harvey Weinstein.”

Farrow took his story to The New Yorker, where seven women were identified making accusations against Weinstein when it was published. He shared a Pulitzer Prize with The New York Times for their stories on Weinstein, which ignited the #metoo movement.

NBC countered on Tuesday that a script of a Farrow story was never reviewed or approved by NBC’s legal department. NBC had no comment on Trump’s tweet.

One of Weinstein’s accusers, Emily Nestor, issued a statement that she had done an interview with Farrow while he was at NBC where her name wasn’t revealed, but had been discussing with him the possibility of being added as a named source. She said another woman had also been willing to be identified in the story. NBC said if Nestor had made such an offer then, it was news to them.

In his statement, Lack said he wondered “whether the brave women who spoke to him in print would have also sat before TV cameras and lights.”

Nestor said that “the condescension dripping from this phrase is despicable. The implication that these ‘brave women’ were just not ‘brave’ enough to go in front of a TV crew undermines all of the dangers, uncertainties and obstacles we faced in coming forward in The New Yorker piece.”

She said it was shameful to impugn Farrow’s character or conduct in working on the story.

The unusually vitriolic argument between NBC and a former reporter isn’t likely to go away soon; Farrow is writing a book about his experiences working on the story. The embarrassment of missing out on a scoop lingers, too. NBC explains its decision to let the story go was because of major disagreements with Farrow and his team. The network also points out that other news outlets had tried and failed to get the Weinstein story before it finally came out.

“If we had tried to hold him and nothing changed, we would have needlessly blocked him from disseminating it via another forum,” Lack wrote to his employees. “And that is why we agreed to let him go elsewhere. If some believe that decision a failure of our competitive instincts, so be it. But it was a decision taken honourably and with good intentions toward Farrow and his work.”

Rich McHugh, Farrow’s former investigative producer who has been speaking out against NBC News since leaving his job at the network last month, called for an independent investigator to look into the dispute.

David Bauder, The Associated Press